Throughout much of the country, declining
workers' compensation rates are music to
employers' ears. After all, that seems like long-
awaited good news, particularly since workers'
compensation is more often than not viewed
as a necessity and a significant cost of doing
business. Although most employers fail to
recognize it, workers' compensation is a core
business practice and a means for improving
the bottom line. Rather than diverting
attention and finances to other business
priorities during periods of lower workers'
compensation rates, employers can benefit by
taking steps to guarantee long-term savings.
Here are eight mistakes employers should
avoid so long-term workers' compensation
savings can be achieved.
Confusing Lower Premium Rates with Cost
Reductions.
Many employers are surprised to learn that a
reduction in workers' compensation rates does
not always mean a reduction in costs.
Workers' compensation functions like a credit
line to finance the costs of injuries. As such,
premium rates alone do not determine the
overall cost of insurance. An experience
modification factor (MOD) tailors the cost of
insurance to the individual loss performance of
an employer. The MOD factor allows an
employer to be compared with similar
employers in the same industry classification. If
past losses are lower than average, a credit
rating reduces the premium. Conversely, if
past losses are higher than average, a debit
rating can actually increase costs in spite of
lower rates.
Becoming Complacent.
While increased attention to safety may lead to
a decline in the number of workplace
accidents, claim frequency is only one part of
the equation. The other part, claim cost
including indemnity (lost wages) and medical
care, continues to rise. In many industries
where there are tight labor markets, wage
gains are expected to trend higher, suggesting
further increases in indemnity severity. At the
same time, medical care costs have marched
relentlessly upward since the mid 1990s.
Even more disturbing is the fact that the
growth in workers' compensation medical costs
has been much steeper than in the health care
industry as a whole. If claims remain open
and injury costs escalate, this will affect the
employer's experience modification factor, thus
increasing costs. Employers should not
become complacent, but continue to
understand what is impacting medical costs
and measure key metrics such as cost per
claim trends in order to stay abreast of
changing costs.
Focusing Only on Direct Costs.
Ask a business person how much is spent on
workers' compensation and almost all will
respond with the price of the premium. Yet,
the direct costs of workers' compensation
often represent only 20 percent to 30 percent
of the overall injury expenses. Indirect
costs, including overtime, temporary labor,
increased training, supervisor time, production
delays, unhappy customers, increased stress
and property or equipment damage represent
several times the direct cost of the injury. A
2002 Safety Index report by Liberty Mutual
tallied the direct cost of workplace injuries at
$40.1 billion. The total financial impact of both
direct and indirect costs was estimated to be
as much as $240 billion. Injury costs - both
direct and indirect - will have a much greater
impact on an employers' overall costs than
rate decreases.
Thinking That Rates Will Stay
Low.
Historically, the workers' compensation price
cycle repeats in a predictable pattern: Rates
decline, insurance is purchased for a lower
price, employers shift focus away from
workers' compensation, claim costs do not fall
in relationship to reduced rates and
employers' MOD increases and rates increase.
During a declining rate cycle, the cycle
suggests that if rates go down, so should
injury costs. However, if employers do not
manage injury effectively and claims do not go
down, the employer's Mod will go up. When
rates rise again, the increased MOD will wipe
out any savings garnered during the declining
rate cycle.
Viewing Workers' Compensation as an
Expense.
Employers should recognize that workers'
compensation is more than a necessary
expense; it is a controllable aspect of business
that if managed properly will have a
measurable and positive return on investment
(ROI). In ROI Selling, authors Michael Nick and
Kurt Koenig note three measures of
ROI: "Return on investment occurs when a
company realizes an increase in revenue, a
reduction in cost or an avoidance of cost."
Viewing workers' compensation as an ongoing
process and not an expense can accomplish
all three. When injuries do occur,
employers can increase their revenues by
getting employees back to work quickly and
reduce their costs by managing the injury
effectively.
By recognizing that workers' compensation
begins at the date of hire, employers can
avoid costs by hiring the right people.
Separating Workers' Compensation From
Employee Retention.
Retaining skilled employees is one of the most
difficult challenges facing businesses today.
Turnover is extremely costly. According to
estimates, it is anywhere from 50 percent to
150 percent of an employee's annual salary.
If a work-related injury is not managed
properly, it can result in the unnecessary loss
of a skilled, trained employee. The longer an
employee is away from their job, the less likely
they are to return. Statistics show that if
employees are not back to work within 12
weeks, they only have a 50 percent chance of
ever returning.
The fundamental reason for most lost time is
not medical necessity but the non-medical
decision-making and lack of a process that
occurs after an employee is injured. The
workplace response is key - studies show that
employees' satisfaction with their employer's
response has a much larger impact on
employment stability than does their
satisfaction with health care itself.
Devaluing Your Relationship With the
Insurance Company or Agent.
In a time of declining rates and new
competition, there is a tendency to shop for
the lowest premium price. The insurance
industry is not immune to the old adage, "You
get what you pay for." Chasing the lowest rate
can result in poor service or having to deal
with an insurance company's unstable
finances. It is critical for employers to
investigate the insurer's stability as well as its
long-term commitment to the workers'
compensation market. Furthermore,
selecting an agent and carrier with an
excellent understanding of workers'
compensation is very important. The added
benefits of improved hiring practices, medical
relationships and comprehensive injury
management services will reduce both the
number of claims and the costs of claims.
Measuring the Wrong Thing.
John Tukey, Ph.D., the prominent statistician,
said, "When the right thing can only be
measured poorly, it tends to cause the wrong
thing to be measured well. When workers'
compensation is treated as a commodity, the
decision is reduced to the lowest possible
common denominator - price. This
shortsighted approach is equivalent to
expecting gourmet food on a fast food budget.
When viewing workers' compensation as a
core business practice of comprehensive risk
management, the focus shifts from price to
tangible metrics that are driving claims costs.
With this information, employers can address
the underlying circumstances and conditions
that are pushing up work-related injury costs
and measure the value of their actions.
Although workers" compensation rates vary
over time, it is necessary that these eight
principles be kept in focus continuously.
Difficult arises when tactics for managing
workers' compensation costs vary over time.
To obtain the best overall benefits, including
reduced premium costs, issues relating to
workers compensation need to be
incorporated into a company's culture and
business practices.
Based on an article written by Frank
Pennachio